top of page

Local Authority Held to be Negligent after Providing Incorrect Information in Response to a Local Se


The High Court has recently held that a County Council had been negligent when it incorrectly stated, in response to a local search, that land did not form part of a public highway.

It was held that the Council had a duty of care at common law to answer the enquiries in its local search accurately. They could not rely on the fact that their highway map was not up to date to discharge liability.

Chesterton Commercial (Oxon) Ltd v Oxfordshire County Council [2015] EWHC 2020 (ch)

Summary of the facts

A property development company ("the Claimants") acquired three properties in the same road. The land included parking spaces. The results of the local search showed that the parking spaces did not form part of a public highway. This was important because there was a shortage of parking in town and the inclusion of the parking spaces increased the price paid for the properties. The Claimants had planned to sell the parking spaces for private parking. After the purchases completed, it emerged that the local search was incorrect. The land containing the parking spaces had been under investigation for some time and the Council eventually concluded that it was part of the highway. The Council argued that the claim should be dismissed because the results of the search were accurate at the time of the request.

Judgement

This was rejected by the Court. The Council should not have stated unequivocally that the land was not part of the public highway when the reality was that the matter was under investigation. The local search would have shown this if the Council had complied with their obligation under section 36(6) Highways Act 1980 to keep a "corrected and up to date" list of the publically maintained streets in their area.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the importance for local authorities and their Highways Records team of keeping a correct and updated list of streets within its area and those which are under consideration. Failure to do so puts the authority at risk of providing inaccurate information in response to local search request. This came at a significant cost to the defendants in the above case (£550,000).

It remains to be seen whether local authorities will now seek to qualify their replies to searches to avoid this situation in the future.

ABOUT DAVITT JONES BOULD​

As the largest, most experienced law firm specialising in real estate in the UK, we have been trusted advisors to the real estate market for 25 years. We have over 75 lawyers, all of whom joined us from senior in-house or private practice roles, and bring an average of 25 years’ post qualification experience each. With their expertise and commercial experience, we advise a prestigious client base in the public and private sector on the full spectrum of real estate legal issues, including commercial property, planning, property litigation, construction, environment, real estate finance and other related areas. Operating in our specialist area uniquely positions us to help other professional firms, and through our Real Estate Support solution we support teams in the silver circle, UK Top 30, US Top 50, the Big Four and beyond.

​

​

Website Privacy Policy

​

© 2025 Davitt Jones Bould Limited (DJB)

LONDON 

Tel: 020 7870 7500 

MANCHESTER

Tel: 0161 669 4800

BIRMINGHAM

Tel: 0121 227 9600 

BUSINESS SERVICES CENTRE

Tel: 0344 880 8000

​

Follow Us:

  • LinkedIn
bottom of page